home


HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 JUNE AD13

Scientologists only

 

AN INTERNATIONAL OBJECTIVE

(This policy letter is for Scientologists only. The attached plans however is BPI. When republishing the attached plans to the pub-lic or Scientology magazines do not publish this covering policy letter.)

When we were attacked in January for using E-Meters I adopted for us two part policy:

1. To hold the line legally and win in courts where possible but in no event to lose ground.

2. To speed up research by passing clear and theta clear as objectives, abandoning work on the technology that give intermit states and concentration on the attain-ment by auditing the state of OT as the best forward answer to our difficulties.

In part one of this program, we are succeeding easily. But it is only short term and world deterioration is accelerating.

In part two we have achieved the technology necessary by an incredible speed up and gain.

We now have OT in direct and real sight with only a few hundred hours of actual skilled auditing intervening. This is an astonishing break through, a real by-the-boot-straps ne-cessity level research sprint.

We are then only month away from having OTs, a year at the most.

No Scientologist need be told what that means.

This fact enters us upon forward planning. The trouble with OTs in the past has only been lack of cooperation and commonly agreed upon objective. Without these OTs eventually fall prey again to smaller beings with bigger organization skill. OT is an unstable state only when OTs are not cooperating with OTs but each one going his own way in the strong but fat-uous believe he can single-handedly survive. The proof is, OTs have not survived as OTs whenever this super individuation collided with the super organization of weaker beings. The answer is to remain organized, mutual assistance and integrity and not lose touch with or re-sponsibility for all levels of life forms and societies.

This means that programs for such agreement must be offered.

The first step is to prevent atomic war and planetary chaos and to utilize Earth as a rehabilitation center since it has already had the technology established here. A second step following after would be to establish units not unlike central organizations, in nearby systems.

No real conflict with stellar powers interested in these areas will develop as I can vouch for the two most concerned in this galaxy, the Espinol United Stars to which the Solar System distantly belongs and the Galactic Confederation to which Espinol moderately bows.

As not all living things are capable of attaining OT (the vast bulk of any numbers of a population like animals, grass and trees are possibly minion in origin). The task of rehabilitation is not as great as it looks.

This leaves us first and foremost with the problem faced by the budding OT, What to do to square things around?

 I recommend that any action taken by any OT on this planet be guided by the attached program An International Objective. Any public ambitions for us or Earth, any vengeful or de-structive urges, any stunts or public actions should be channeled into accomplishing the at-tached program.

Several OTs even if acting independently could accomplish this. Further the plan has some chance of succeeding even if driven in ordinary ways such as placing copies if it in the various offices of the United Nations, putting it into newspapers, within the attentive of large commercial interests to it, etc.

We could probably each one of us think of a plan for Earth. Let us instead agree upon a feasible plan in which all of us can cooperate.

ANY PRECLEAR MOVING TOWARD OT SHOULD READ THIS POLICY LETTER AND THE PLAN. THE PUBLIC MAY BE SHOWN THIS PLAN AND IT MAY BE REPUBLISHED ANYWHERE. THIS POLICY LETTER MAY NOT BE MADE PUBLIC.

 

                                                                                                                           L. RON HUBBARD



 

 

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 JULY 1963

 

 

(Staff Meeting Material)

It may help you to know the immediate future planning in Scientology.

Research-wise O.T. is wrapped up. It’s just a matter of getting the data out, getting it applied. The Track is complicated. The length of time in processing is long. But this is offset by the fact that IF YOU GET CON-SISTENT TA ACTION THE CASE WILL EVENTUALLY MAKE O.T.

 

ORGANIZATION OF SUBJECT

I am dividing Scientology data into five levels and I think you will see the usefulness of this.

FIRST LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY ONE

Useable data about living - and life, applicable without training, presented in Continental Magazines and booklets. This is for anyone. It contains assists as its auditing level. You have much of this already around. It is a complete unit in itself. “Be Right With Scientology.”

SECOND LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY TWO

Academy HPA/HCA accomplishment level. Scientology for use in spiritual healing. This is a healing strata, using the wealth of past processes which produced results on various illnesses. I am shortly sending out questionnaires to get all Healing process results as a research project. The auditing level is Reach and With-draw and Repetitive Processes. The target is human illness. We have never entered this field but as we are not thanked for staying out of it, we might as well dominate it. It is a good procurement area.

THIRD LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY THREE

Clearing and O.T. preparatory levels including advanced auditing above HPA/HCA Level. The work on this was more or less suspended when it became obvious that O.T. had to be attained. Includes key out, clear-ing and other sub O.T. states. However, much technology exists on it. This is the level of the better human being.

FOURTH LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY FOUR

Processes to O.T., Saint Hill Special Briefing Course 1963 type technology and targets.

FIFTH LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY FIVE

Scientology applied at a high echelon to social, political and scientific problems. This requires the earlier levels and a high state of training on theoretical and wide application levels.

Data for levels one to four is mostly already researched, most of it is in your hands and many publications already exist. Level Three needs a lot of codifying but is not difficult to assemble. You’ll see a lot of Level One now from me for magazines and a lot of new booklets using older materials. Level Four is more or less complete, more so now than three.

This brings a lot of order to our technical and gets us past the “past lives” scramble and other points which slow dissemination by relegating these to upper levels. Lord knows we have enough fascinating data at Level One without feeding the public Level Four.

 

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

We are neating up the corporate structures of Scientology, using each org as a company whose majority shares are owned by a central company. This makes the structure easier to handle and better off for tax purposes. The instructions on this will soon be released. Shares and Life Memberships-will all be properly adjusted.

 

ORGANIZATIONAL ATTITUDE

Finding exactly who we’re up against on Earth (the A.M.A.) helped. But finding exactly what each one of us faces and how in the Between Lives Area bids for a change of mood.

We’re not now in this for play. Our personal futures depend on keeping going and making no major flubs. It isn’t a question of is there something else. There isn’t, Nobody can be half in and half out of Scientology. Scientologists are Scientologists no matter what they do for a living.

If we’re going to make this we have to work at it personally, administratively and as a group and work well.

The prize is regaining self and going free. The penalty for our failure is condemnation to an eternity of pain and amnesia for ourselves and for our friends and for this planet,

If we fail we’ve had it. It’s not just a matter of getting killed. It’s a matter of getting killed and killed and killed life after life forever more. Even if you have no great reality on this now you will soon enough. But probably you already understand it.

Those guys up there mean business. We’ve got to match or better their energy level and dedication or we lose.

 We’ve been given this priceless chance.

We must make good.

The hour lost on natter, the slow down time because of some petty ARC Break have to be salvaged.

We haven’t any time for doubts and maunderings.

We’re the elite of Planet Earth, but that’s only saying we’re the not quite gone in the graveyard of the long gone.

Somehow, despite our condition and the degraded environment we’re in, we’ve got to keep the dedication and the guts to carry through no matter what comes. And carry through.

And that’s our future.

 

L. RON HUBBARD

 


 HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 AUGUST AD 13

 

CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TARGETS

PROJECT 80

A PREVIEW  

 

I have now consolidated and fully proven a break through on basic auditing which changes organization targets and means a great deal to Organization and Association Secretaries, HCO Secretaries, Technical Directors, Directors of Processing and Training, PE Directors, Registrars, Letter Registrars, Staff Auditors and Instructors, and the state of the Academy, HGC and Staff Co-Audit.

This technical advance makes many other things possible. We will designate their broad application to Central Org planning and dissemination, PROJECT 80.

Essentially what has happened is that I have found the minimum essentials of why auditing works, and have selected out the important, parts for concentration. These parts are: (1) (In Scientology One and Two) THE ITSA LINE; (2) (In Scientology Two) TONE ARM ACTION; (3) (In Scientology Two) DIRECTING THE PC'S ATTENTION TO THOSE THINGS WHICH BAR HIM FROM RELEASE AND CLEAR; and (4) (In Scientology Three and Four) DIRECTING THE PC'S ATTENTION TO AND HANDLING THOSE THINGS WHICH BAR HIM FROM O.T.
This looks almost too simple. But it makes for an enormous difference in results and dissemination. Why? Because of the ease by which auditing results can be attained. Because SIMPLICITY makes for far reaching ease of Communication.

 

  NEW SCIENTOLOGY BASIC DEFINITIONS

 I (c) Scientology 1: WHAT IS AN AUDITOR?

  An auditor is one who listens. Auditor means listener.

2. Scientology 1: WHAT IS A PRECLEAR?

One who is discovering things about himself and who is becoming clearer.

3. Scientology 1: WHAT IS A CASE GAIN?

  Any case betterment according to the pc

4. Scientology 1: WHAT IS SCIENTOLOGY?

  The common people's science of life and betterment.

5. Scientology I: HOW IS SCIENTOLOGY DIFFERENT?

In Scientology the preclear is always right. Scientology holds that people know best about themselves.

6. Scientology 1: WHAT IS SCIENTOLOGY AGAINST?

Scientology is against brutality and euthanasia in medical brain damaging, and against abuse and slavery and punishment in any form.

7. Scientology I: WHAT DOES SCIENTOLOGY STAND FOR?

  Freedom from mystery. Freedom from fear.

8. Scientology I: WHAT IS A BOOK AUDITOR?

Someone who has studied books on Scientology and listens to other people to make them better.

9. Scientology I: WHAT IS A CO-AUDIT?

  A team of any two people who are helping each other reach a better life with Scientology processing.

10. Scientology I: WHAT IS AN AUDITING SESSION?

  A precise period of time during which the auditor listens to the preclear's ideas about himself.

11. Scientology II: WHAT IS PROFESSIONAL AUDITING?

  Sessions given by a trained auditor who is governed by ethical codes and technical skill, who directs the pc's attention to areas which when examined by the preclear will cause a release of sufficient charge to cause Tone Arm Action, thus reaching the eventual state of clear.

12. Scientology I: WHAT IS A RELEASE?

  One who knows he can continue to improve by auditing and that lie will not now become worse in life.

13. Scientology 11: WHAT IS A CLEAR?

  One who has straightened up this lifetime.

(Note: These definitions and others like them should be published and posted and lectured about continually until familiar to everyone.)

You will find that if you concentrate on these aspects of Scientology and auditing, your dissemination will improve. Where you exceed this simplicity inside the organization's technical departments and activities you will probably have more losses than gains in all auditing done except that by Saint Hill graduates. This includes auditing supervised by Saint Hill graduates- meaning that where even this supervised auditing exceeds the above definitions you will have more loses than wins. In fact, it takes Saint Hill graduates to groove even this auditing level in, so don't despise it.

As an organization your future depends on SERVICE. Where service attempts to exceed the above definitions, you will have financial and technical loses and Dev-T.

This does not mean Saint Hill grads should not co-audit at the level of Class IV. It does mean that where you insist others exceed the above technical levels you will have a mess.

Itsa Line in and TA moving, and anyone will eventually go O.T. so you're not barring people out. Indeed, you're only then MAKING IT POSSIBLE FOR THEM TO GO O.T.

R I C is your work horse for co-audits, W Unit, outside co-audit teams, etc. R2C is your professional level version, up to clear. Your service includes ARC Break Assessments and all Scientology I and Scientology 11 skills and data.

This means fast Academy training, good permanent HGC results, good public dissemination, and few headaches.

This does NOT mean that those qualified and classed to run III and IV material in an Org cannot do so. It means only that an Org specializes in positive wins at I and 11.

We have now exceeded processing results of former years with just the Itsa Line and TA motion, in spite of the simplicity of the material.

We have also exceeded by technical advance, public reality. Therefore, we have, in the various classes of data, Scientology within Scientology.

A firm Scientology One in the public lines and PE, a good Scientology Two in the Academy and HGC, and you're in. Scientology THREE and FOUR are firmly based in the accomplishment first of Scientology ONE and TWO. And Scientology Five is based firmly on Scientology Four. So, one level is based wholly upon the earlier level and particularly agree in A, R and C with that level. The A, R and C of Scientology One match the public, the co-audits, and the lower levels of the Academy. When that A, R and C has been attained, then the being is ready for Scientology Two and can gradually increase his A, R and C to match it. And so on.

f those of us whose A, R and C already match Scientology Three and Four (and this includes a lot of HPA/HCAs and old timers), continue to run orgs only at that A, R and C level we will certainly lift the orgs away from the A, R and C potential of new public and even Scientology Two people. Creating ivory towers, we then cut our public line. You would be amazed how far above the public technical grasp even THIS IS LIFE is! Yet it, at the moment, is our best Scientology One book. Actually, it's at the level of Scientology Two. We have just learned this by testing some Saint Hill students!!!

Thus, when we exceed the above data for Scientology One and Two and fail to keep supporting work and data at those levels, we cut ourselves off from the vast majority of the public and even some Scientologists and find ourselves standing quite alone in the civilization. Our potential, with what we know, is a majority of all populations solidly with us. We have not accomplished that because (1) We didn't have our subject in orderly divisions (2) We were still concentrating on problems of upper level technical now solved and (3) We had already out our bridge to the general public and average practitioner by technically exceeding his A, R and C potential.

Therefore, as I think you will agree, we must publicly disseminate at the level of Scientology One only; get outside public co-audit processing teams (not groups) doing only Scientology One processing on which they can win. Specialize in org (HGC and Academy) technical on Scientology ONE and TWO only. And use Scientology Three, Four and Five to run the show and pick up those whose A, R and C is graduating up to them.

I hope you see this as sound policy. I know already that technical wins are in store for orgs using only the above data.

The keynote of an org is not money. It is SERVICE. If service is given at the level of the A, R and C demanding it, money floods in.

SERVICE means technical results. My heaviest interest is in high technical results and I know that what I am outlining for you here will give you higher technical gain per student and pc than any amount of higher-level data inadequately rendered. Therefore, I am not downgrading but upgrading technical with this simplicity, as you will discover.

I have to write up Scientology One and Scientology Two articles and texts. But you already have the technical side of them or will have in a few days of this Policy Letter.

It will take some doing to groove all this in. If you do, there are your new buildings and mobs of people and bursting bank accounts and influence.

So, this is it organizationally. We're readying up for the public kick off. We'll all have to work hard to accomplish it. But we can do it-providing we do not exceed the basics above and providing we give SERVICE at the A, R and C level of those demanding it.

 

L. RON HUBBARD

 


home